01
Bitcoin (BTC)
PassLiquidity: A+
Key reason: Pure digital commodity, no embedded interest, no haram revenue.
Per AAOIFI-aligned framework, our screening shows Bitcoin clearing all four gates cleanly. The protocol is proof-of-work with miner fees as the sole revenue mechanism — no riba in the security model. There is no central treasury holding interest-bearing instruments. Business activity is general-purpose store-of-value and payment, both permissible. Liquidity is the deepest in the market across every major spot pair. Bitcoin is the most defensible halal crypto asset in 2026 by every metric we apply.
Read full BTC screening →02
Ethereum (ETH)
PassLiquidity: A+
Key reason: Proof-of-stake rewards treated as ujrah (service fee), not riba.
Per AAOIFI-aligned framework, our screening shows Ethereum passing with the proof-of-stake characterisation that has emerged as the majority contemporary view. Validator rewards are protocol-level service fees for transaction validation work — closer to wages than to interest on a loan. Smart-contract platform usage is general-purpose; while haram applications exist on Ethereum, the network's primary revenue mix passes our 5% threshold. Liquidity is exceptional.
Read full ETH screening →03
Solana (SOL)
PassLiquidity: A+
Key reason: High-throughput L1 with passing protocol revenue mix.
Per AAOIFI-aligned framework, our screening shows Solana passing all four gates. Validator economics are proof-of-stake with priority fees and base fees — both are service-fee classifications. The ecosystem has notable haram-application exposure (some prediction markets, some adult content), but at protocol revenue level it remains under our 5% threshold. Liquidity on top spot pairs is excellent.
Read full SOL screening →04
Cardano (ADA)
PassLiquidity: A
Key reason: Conservative PoS design with limited haram-application exposure.
Per AAOIFI-aligned framework, our screening shows Cardano passing comfortably. The peer-reviewed development cadence and conservative ecosystem composition keep haram exposure low. Validator rewards follow the standard PoS service-fee logic. Liquidity is solid on majors, thinner on smaller pairs.
Read full ADA screening →05
Polkadot (DOT)
PassLiquidity: A
Key reason: Multi-chain interoperability, clean protocol revenue.
Per AAOIFI-aligned framework, our screening shows Polkadot passing. Validator economics, parachain auctions, and ecosystem revenue all clear our gates without notable issues. Treasury composition is monitored quarterly. Liquidity is strong across major spot pairs.
Read full DOT screening →06
Avalanche (AVAX)
PassLiquidity: A
Key reason: Subnet architecture, screened for haram subnet revenue.
Per AAOIFI-aligned framework, our screening shows Avalanche passing. We monitor the subnet ecosystem closely because the multi-chain architecture creates the possibility of haram-subnet revenue contributing to protocol economics. Current mix remains under threshold. Liquidity on AVAX itself is good.
Read full AVAX screening →07
Chainlink (LINK)
PassLiquidity: A
Key reason: Oracle network with utility-driven token economics.
Per AAOIFI-aligned framework, our screening shows Chainlink passing. The token's primary use is paying for oracle services — a clear ujrah classification. Node operator rewards are service fees for verifiable data delivery. Treasury composition has been screened and clears Gate 2.
Read full LINK screening →08
Polygon (MATIC)
PassLiquidity: A
Key reason: L2 scaling layer with passing revenue mix.
Per AAOIFI-aligned framework, our screening shows Polygon passing. As an Ethereum L2, the bulk of MATIC's revenue comes from transaction fees and validator service. We continue to monitor the broader Polygon ecosystem token migration; current screening reflects the live token state.
Read full MATIC screening →09
Cosmos (ATOM)
PassLiquidity: B+
Key reason: Inter-chain hub with PoS service-fee economics.
Per AAOIFI-aligned framework, our screening shows Cosmos passing. The Cosmos Hub's proof-of-stake validator economics and IBC transfer fees are both service-fee classifications. Liquidity is good on majors but thinner than top-five names.
Read full ATOM screening →10
NEAR Protocol (NEAR)
PassLiquidity: B+
Key reason: Sharded L1 with clean treasury composition.
Per AAOIFI-aligned framework, our screening shows NEAR passing. The protocol's user-friendly account model and sharded execution don't introduce any structural Shariah concerns. Treasury composition is reviewed quarterly. Liquidity is solid on majors.
Read full NEAR screening →11
Algorand (ALGO)
PassLiquidity: B
Key reason: Pure PoS L1, low haram-application exposure.
Per AAOIFI-aligned framework, our screening shows Algorand passing. The pure proof-of-stake design and conservative ecosystem keep haram exposure minimal. Liquidity is acceptable on top spot pairs but thinner than the larger L1s.
Read full ALGO screening →12
Stellar (XLM)
PassLiquidity: A
Key reason: Cross-border payments network, utility-focused.
Per AAOIFI-aligned framework, our screening shows Stellar passing. The network's primary use case is cross-border value transfer — a clear utility application. The Stellar Foundation's treasury composition is screened. Liquidity on XLM is strong.
Read full XLM screening →13
Litecoin (LTC)
PassLiquidity: A
Key reason: Proof-of-work commodity, no embedded interest.
Per AAOIFI-aligned framework, our screening shows Litecoin passing under the same logic as Bitcoin. Proof-of-work, miner-fee revenue model, no central treasury issues. Liquidity is good across majors.
Read full LTC screening →14
Bitcoin Cash (BCH)
PassLiquidity: B+
Key reason: PoW fork, identical halal logic to Bitcoin.
Per AAOIFI-aligned framework, our screening shows Bitcoin Cash passing. The PoW design and miner-fee economics mirror Bitcoin's. Liquidity is acceptable on majors.
Read full BCH screening →15
Arbitrum (ARB)
Pass with caveatLiquidity: A
Key reason: L2 with DAO governance — treasury composition monitored.
Per AAOIFI-aligned framework, our screening shows Arbitrum passing with caveat. The DAO-governed treasury includes stablecoin holdings whose composition we monitor closely; if treasury allocation to interest-bearing stables exceeds the Gate 2 threshold, the verdict would shift. Currently passing. Liquidity is strong.
Read full ARB screening →16
Optimism (OP)
Pass with caveatLiquidity: A
Key reason: Similar L2/DAO profile to Arbitrum, same caveat applies.
Per AAOIFI-aligned framework, our screening shows Optimism passing with caveat. The DAO treasury and Retroactive Public Goods Funding mechanisms are unique but do not introduce structural Shariah issues. Treasury composition is monitored quarterly. Liquidity is strong.
Read full OP screening →17
Aptos (APT)
PassLiquidity: B+
Key reason: Move-VM L1, validator economics clear.
Per AAOIFI-aligned framework, our screening shows Aptos passing. The Move-based execution model and validator service-fee economics clear our gates. We continue to monitor early-stage tokenomics maturation. Liquidity is acceptable on top pairs.
Read full APT screening →18
Sui (SUI)
PassLiquidity: B+
Key reason: Object-centric L1, passing protocol revenue mix.
Per AAOIFI-aligned framework, our screening shows Sui passing. Object-centric data model is unusual but does not raise structural Shariah concerns. Validator and storage-fund mechanics clear Gate 2. Liquidity is acceptable.
Read full SUI screening →19
Hedera (HBAR)
Pass with caveatLiquidity: B
Key reason: Hashgraph consensus, governance council monitored.
Per AAOIFI-aligned framework, our screening shows Hedera passing with caveat. The governance-council model is unusual; we monitor the council members' published activities for any haram-sector exposure that could shift the verdict. Treasury composition has been reviewed. Liquidity is moderate.
Read full HBAR screening →20
Tron (TRX)
ConditionalLiquidity: A
Key reason: DPoS L1; ecosystem haram exposure under review.
Per AAOIFI-aligned framework, our screening shows Tron as conditional. The native protocol economics pass Gates 1–3 cleanly, but the broader ecosystem hosts notable gambling and adult-content applications. Whether these exceed the 5% protocol-revenue threshold depends on ongoing measurement. We list it here for transparency; in our universe its eligibility is reassessed monthly. Conservative-tier portfolios may exclude it; Multi-X allows opt-in based on the latest reading.
Read full TRX screening →